Showing results for tag "us politics"
In generations past, information was provided by word of mouth, or through reading, either in a book, a letter or a periodical. It was a slow system, but it did have an advantage: information came in one item at a time, and people had an opportunity to chew on the new bit of information for a while and consider whether to accept it or not.
Shortly after the founding of the United States, the Constitution made it clear that the government was not to be in the business of printing paper currency. What gave the Founding Fathers the keen insight to incorporate such an important point into such a fundamental document? Jeff Thomas explains.
It should come as no surprise that many of our readers are independent-thinkers, exceptionally freedom-minded and fiercely libertarian. The smaller the government, the better so far as they are concerned. Indeed, some believe there should be no government at all. That said, today's feature might be of interest to the entire spectrum of political persuasion even if for just a lark: a small government without parties - just independents (supposedly) working for their constituents rather than vested interests. Jeff Thomas explains...
At least when it comes to the media, Ron Paul has it rough. They started out by ignoring him but have now moved onto denigration and defamation of character. But how far will it all go? Jeff Thomas considers the possibilities, however extreme some may be...
Feudalism in the past has always been a dictatorship in which the common people (serfs) worked hard to provide for their overlord (the king), and sometimes had a little left over to provide for their own families. Today, things are different.
As readers will most likely know, the US Congress, in its decision to raise the debt limit of the federal government, chose to create a "Super Committee", which would have a temporary job of determining $1.2 trillion in budget cuts over the next ten years. After appointing this committee, Congress went on vacation for a month. Sounds reasonable, doesn't it?
For many years, we have been predicting that the die has been cast for economic and political cataclysm for the US economy and, by extension, that of the first world. Not surprisingly, the reaction by most others over the years is that the sun is still shining and that only a "Chicken Little" would be predicting a major storm. During this period, most people have said, "We'll deal with it if it comes and not before."